AG Schnozz wrote:
>
> And for wedding/portrait work, which we both do, we agree that
> the higher resolution is pretty much a waste. He figures he
> needs four years of use from his camera system to break even.
> The C*non upgrade treadmill is causing a lot of professionals to
> lose a lot of money.
>
> More than once he's looked at my E-1 and said "how much did you
> pay for that?" I remind him that my investment is proportional
> to my income, though. At which point his wife says "income?"
----------------------------------------------------
There's no question but, for what I do, the E-1 and 14-54 alone could do
85% of my photography and help stay off the upgrade treadmill. However,
the fast focus, low light focus, high ISO performance and high sync
speed of the 20D are still a siren song for me. But I haven't committed
either way so far.
Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|