bs.pearce@xxxxxxx wrote:
>><http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml>
>
> First, I would hardly call Luminous Landscape an impartial wource. Although
> there is a lot of good info there, he is a tireless promoter of Canon
> digital.
>
> I've not compared results of the 1Ds, but I have with the 20, and it is a
> fine camera. Just don't depend on it to resolve fine detail.
>
> Again, I refer you to Steve Troy's previous posts on this subject. For those
> of us that don't shoot people, there remains room for improvement. For
> weddings, protraits, events, etc. those cameras are fine. To suggest the 20D
> betters film is hard to stand behind.
-----------------------------------------------
I understand full well that Reichmann is often a Canon mouthpiece. But
I don't believe that extends to falsification of the images presented.
I accept the test results for what they are. And if anyone would
actually bother to read from the link I have posted you will see that
the subject material is a detailed architectural shot and not a portrait.
If the results presented are not accurate and do not prove the case for
resolution (at least) what is wrong with them? Why is the test invalid?
Chuck Norcutt
http://www.chucknorcutt.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|