Sometimes seeing is not believing, you have to use it and test it yourself,
they are heavily biased, I never trust them.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> You apparently haven't read the article. The 20D is not mentioned since
> the article was written 2 years before it was announced. The comment
> about the 20D is my own interpolation of the data. Please take the time
> to read it before knocking down the conclusion.
>
> The article compares output from the 1Ds (11 MP) to Fuji Velvia rated at
> ISO 40 and scanned on an Isomet 405HR drum scanner as well as a 3200 ppi
> Imacon. From the images presented the 1Ds image is clearly superior to
> the Imacon scan and fully equal to the drum scan.
>
> The images are there for you to see. Either he lied or the 1Ds at 11 MP
> is the equal of a 6x7 negative at far less cost. It took the high cost
> drum scan to equal (not beat) the digital image.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
> http://www.chucknorcutt.com/
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|