> If you're shooting 35mm film the 20D (8MP) has already passed
> you by.
> If you're shooting 6x7 the 1Ds (11MP) passed you by almost 3
> years ago.
> Hard to believe? Look at the data presented here:
> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml>
If this was REALLY true, why do people tend to say "digital is
better than film UP TO X-SIZE, and then beyond that film is
better."
I wouldn't consider the opinion expressed on luminous-landscape
to be the end-all in this format argument. I can guarantee you
that he'll dump that p.o.s. 20D for the 5D in a heartbeat. Then
you'll hear him crow about how it's better than 35mm film--all
over again. Hey, according to him, even the 30D was better than
35mm film.
I surely would be ticked if I had just invested a fortune in a
C*non APS setup... "Whadda mean these lenses don't work?"
AG-living in the world of 4/3-Schnozz
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|