Well, the other thing is that you don't know what kind of perks the
web site owners are getting from the camera companies. I tend to
trust the reviews on Photodo, but they haven't tested that lens.
Pretty much every other site leaves me wondering if I'm getting a
pitch. Especially with C@non gear.
On Aug 19, 2005, at 5:33 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I've read a number of reports on this lens and they range from very
> complimentary (such as the review below) to this is just a so-so
> lens to
> this is a piece of extremely overpriced crap. I don't know which is
> correct. The scary part is they all may be correct. I suspect that
> Canon may be having a lot of QC problems as they attempt to keep up
> with
> the demand.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|