I couldn't tell a lot just pointing it around the store, but it
seemed like a handy range of focal lengths. 28-135mm would cover
about 90% of what I want to shoot and it being really compact with IS
didn't hurt at all, IMO. Not that this site is always on-the-money or
anything, but I notice there were some kind words about the lens in
this review of the 20D.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/20d-part1.shtml
On Aug 19, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Moose wrote:
> OK, so the price leader kit lenses are cheaply built, most reports are
> that they are optically pretty good. However, the 17-85 IS is not in
> that category.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|