At 8:26 AM -0500 2005.07.21, <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Andrew,
>
>But when you put the negative on a light box, doesn't it look great? That
>was my surprise when first using it.
Oh yes. And scans nicely too.
>I think #3 is the lowest grade I've used in printing SP2 negatives. I have
>gone as far as 5 1/2 on my Ilford head, and that still required a lot og
>careful dodging and burning.
OK, that's where I'll go next.
>I'm going to try underexposing in half stop increments next. Don't know what
>to expect.
>
Let's know how it goes.
I'm going to try some more controlled comparisons myself when I get a
chance (which won't be for a while).
This can be a very versatile film. The lab processing can be a letdown
though -- one nice negative came back with a big blotch on it.
thanks for the hints
Andrew
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|