C.H.Ling wrote:
>I'm very intereted on getting smaller and good quality JPEG so I download
>GIMP for a trial. I'm not a fan of any software, as long as they are good I
>will use it. Here is the result I got, may be there are some tricky setting
>in GIMP that I don't know yet, I see little different between PS7, InfanView
>and GIMP in quality of compression (for similar file size) even veiw at
>300%, here is what I got:
>
>The last one is obviously soft and only reduce the file size a little bit.
>
>If there are any good setting that let me compress the file to smaller size
>and still got good result just let me know.
>
>
Thanks so much for that work C.H.!!! I was about to do the same kind of
comparison.
I just can't believe there would be very much difference in different
software implementations of the same defined compression standard.
I see from your results that indeed there isn't. Flipping through them
without looking at the names, there is no difference I can see between
them except the one which is clearly softer.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|