On Jul 12, 2005, at 3:54 PM, Earl Dunbar wrote:
> I really don't think you can beat Tri-X, but then I haven't played
> much
> with HP5 Plus, APX 400 or Neopan. I've seen some shots on
> rangefinderforum.com of Tri-X pushed to ridiculous ISOs that really
> impressed me, so it's flexible.
I've always enjoyed shooting Tri-X. My first newspaper job was at a
place where they used to bulk load HP5 for me all the time and when
I'd occasionally shoot some of my own Tri-X I'd get comments on how
good my shots looked that week. I just get nervous about always
reaching for the old standby these days. I'm always sure someone will
tell me about some new wonderfilm I'm an idiot for not using. ;-)
> That said... WHAT'S ONE MORE BODY? Take the OM-2n too ... it's small!
You're the voice of the Devil. ;-)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|