Subject: | [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2 |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:18:55 +1000 |
On 10/06/2005, at 12:59 AM, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas wrote: > I don't know why, but I don't feel the need for anything between 40 > and 85mm. As the actress said to the bishop? :-) AndrewF ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: It's like an E-1 Christmas!, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Attempt at Classic B&W's [was: An English apology !], John A. Lind |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: New E-1 shot, Timpe, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |