Thanks, Moose.
--- Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Der Eiserne Reiter wrote:
>
> >Winsor,
> >
> >this is true for some lenses, but not for others. For example,
> >the 35/2 peaks at f11 and f16, in Gary's test. Also, I am wondering
> >if it depends on the shape of the aperture, nr. of blades, etc.
> >The other day, on *bay, I saw the picture of a Zeiss lens
> >with a triangular aperture and was wondering what this did to
> >the picture.
> >
> Where the aperture is located in comnplex lens designs affects what
> absolute physical size it is and thus where diffraction becomes a problem.
>
> Aperture shape could certainly have an effect, although what it might
> be, I don't know. Shape does have a big effect on bokeh/OOF images
> <http://www.darkroom.com/MiscDocs/bokeh.pdf>.
>
> Moose
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
FeRider (R.)
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|