| Subject: | [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2 |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:48:31 +1000 |
Not as tough as taking a decent picture with one! AndrewF On 06/06/2005, at 11:25 PM, Piers Hemy wrote: > > Hmm, that took a bit of working out... > > --snip > the Alostenb TLR. > AndrewF > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: WTB: Zuiko 100/2.8 & 24/2.8, Piers Hemy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Initials before Zuiko?, Darin Rhein |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2, Piers Hemy |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2, Piers Hemy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |