>Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Old socks are likely to deposit as much as they remove. The Swiffer may
>> be a revelation to you. It really is like a magnet.
>
> Interesting -- I'd assumed it was another of those things they'd
>invented purely to sell us more supplies, but I'll give it a look.
Don't confuse it with the Swiffer Wet, though. The DIRECTIONS FOR USE
on the that product's package (as sold in Canada) begin as follows:
"(for U.S. only): It is in violation of U.S. federal law to use this
product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling." There is no
similar caution for Canadians and Mexicans, presumably due to the
laxness of the legal system in those NAFTA countries.
So: what U.S. federal law is this? And what "inconsistent" uses would
constitute violations? And the penalty for such violations? Enquiring
minds want to know...
Michael
--
Michael R. Collins ... Michael.Collins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|