The more I look at these the more they look the same. If you could add
a little bit of random noise to the digital image to simulate the film
grain I'll bet that they would be almost indistinguishable.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> I'm fascinated by how the two are both so similar and yet so different
> in many subtle details. For example, the rivets seem just a little
> sharper on the digital image on both sides of paint texture that seems
> better defined on film. No sky here to look at grain, but other shots
> make it clear that the combo of Vista 200 and my scanner is quite a bit
> grainier looking than with Royal Gold 400.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|