Joel Wilcox wrote:
> Some of them Ag Schnozz has already summarized better than
> I could have (I hate it when he does that),
It's an Iowa thing.
> but I do like how digital greens are rendered, for some
> reason.
Whereas I'm the opposite. I'm really struggling to get the
greens the way I like them. There is no substitute for Velvia.
The only way I've been able to get the greens to land right is
to dial out some blue-channel gamma, but that ends up skewing
everything else.
> One apparent difference in taste between us is that I
> apparently like a little noise. I have literally never used
> NR software on any E-1 photograph that I have printed of any >
size (I can print up to 11 x 14 on my Photo EX).
I wish I could say the same thing. For web-display, I may whack
some noise out. For portraiture prints I'm leaving things alone.
Anything ISO 400 and above does 'usually' benefit from some
noise-reduction.
AG
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|