I don't know about high end LCDs, but I can't adequately evaluate photos
on our ThinkPad T42. For proper viewing, I use our (non-calibrated)
Sony Trinitron. I agree with the problem with text, though I don't
often get the headaches.
Earl
ScottGee1 wrote:
>Mark, I suspect your older, calibrated Trinitron is more accurate than
>most LCD monitors. The latter really fall down when one tries to edit
>at high magnification.
>
>Also, IMO, LCDs usually do a bad job with text - give me a headache.
>I hope my company doesn't decide to 'upgrade' us to them.
>
>ScottGee1
>
>On 4/28/05, Mark Dapoz <md@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, C.H.Ling wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I think it is a matter of preference, monitor
>>>calibration could be one of the reasons but with the latest LCD I don't see
>>>it a big problem. My company's cheap 17" LCD just render very close to my
>>>mid-range EIZO except less bright even at max setting.
>>>
>>>
>>I'm using an older Trinitron based monitor which is calibrated using an
>>Eye One. I'm not sure how that compares to a good LCD monitor, but I assume
>>they would be similar.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Since we are seeing quite differently, it is still a mystery.
>>>
>>>
>>Maybe there's something in the air :-)
>> -mark
>>
>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|