Subject: | [OM] Re: RAW |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:11:48 -0400 |
I aboslutely can. Absolutely. Can I at 4x6 or perhaps even 8x10? No, not likely. Can I at 24x36? Of course. Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:49 AM Subject: [OM] Re: RAW > Can you tell the difference between a 48 bit TIFF and a high quality > JPEG... after it's printed? My guess is no. I don't think any > printer/ink combo can reproduce the detail that's in the JPEG let alone > the TIFF. It makes sense to maintain all possible detail on an image > that may undergo further editing but I don't think the final sharpened, > printable image need be other than a JPEG. > > Chuck Norcutt ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: WAS: Re: WTB: Bogen/Manfrotto 410/3275, etc. NOW: Cullman plate system, Walt Wayman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: RAW, BILL CLARK |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: RAW, jking |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: RAW, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |