[OM] Re: Digital, digital, digital. Bah, humbug!

[James N. McBride]

Why not use the best tool for the job at hand. Both digital and film have
their place. I "need" both. /jmac

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Rob Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 5:57 PM
To: OM List
Subject: [OM] Re: Digital, digital, digital. Bah, humbug!


On 4/13/05 4:40 PM, "Earl Dunbar" <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Don't go, Walt.  You are one of the sages of the OM/analogue world.

I'd have to second that Walt!

I'm a analogue/digital guy myself. (Or should I say A.D.D.?) For the really
big prints, nothing I've seen so far beats an 80Mb or so drum scan of a
negative. Yum.

Rob in Seattle





==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================