I will be following this with interest as well, I have noted that the
e-1 can be bought much cheaper with the 14-45 lens as supplied with the
e-300, has anybody compared the lenses side by side as well. Although I
intend to use the OM lenses most of the time, in reality the kit lens
would probably get used more and more from the issue of convenience, and
should maybe be part of the consideration.
re article :- I was suspcious of that when I say the date.
Daniel Mitchell wrote:
> NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>For those of you who chose either an
>>E-1 or E-300 over other DSLRs, what was it that made you choose the
>>Olympus?
>
>
> I don't know if this went by on the list and I missed it, but if anyone's
> looking to choose and waiting for the E-2 to come out, it may be longer than
> you'd want:
>
> "Matsushita and Olympus are expected to exhibit new digital SLRs at the Photo
> Marketing Association (PMA) show in February 2006. The interchangeable lens
> D-SLRs will comply with the FourThirds standard in 2006. [...]"
>
> from http://www.dpreview.com/news/0504/05040102matshushita_dslr.asp
>
> -- dan
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|