Thanks, Walt. Next time conveniently drop the cell phone onto concrete
just before leaving.
Earl
Walt Wayman wrote:
>Earl,
>
>Better late than never with an answer. I've been off on an adventure,
>pleasantly far removed from any sort of computer or other leash to
>civilization, except my wife's damn cell phone, although we did linger a while
>in a place or two where it had "no bars" on its ugly little face.
>
>I rate Efke 25 at -- surprise, surprise -- 25 and develop it at the usual
>20C/68F for 7 minutes in R09 1:40 or for 8 1/2 minutes in D-76 1:1. I will
>alter these times by 30 seconds or up to 1 minute depending on the subject
>matter and whether or not I'm trying to increase or decrease contrast.
>
>Also, this film should be given a 1-minute water bath prior to immersion in
>the developer. Other than that, just handle it like any other B&W film.
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>"Anything more than 500 yards from
>the car just isn't photogenic." --
>Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>>Thanks Walt... that was the kind of information I was seeking. One last
>>question: Is the published speed accurate? One of the problems I had
>>with Pan F was that it was really picky with exposure; my experience
>>that it really wasn't ASA 50. And despite some attempts to nail exposure
>>and development, I never got it right, even though I could "conquer" any
>>other film.
>>
>>I'll check out the J&C site again; I've visited it a few times in the past.
>>
>>Earl
>>
>>
>>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|