Subject: | [OM] Re: The downside of film scanning |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:46:47 -0700 |
This was a test, right? Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Apr 8, 2005, at 9:10 PM, Moose wrote: > > 3. That's the secret reason people are going digital. :-) An E-1 TIFF > is only about 16kb and a RAW under 11kb. 300D RAW files average about > 7kb. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA http://homepage.mac.com/wincros/PhotoAlbum3.html ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] #106, GeeBee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT-ish] PC vs Mac - A SERIOUS discussion, and opinions wanted, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: The downside of film scanning, Moose |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: The downside of film scanning, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |