| Subject: | [OM] Re: Having 90/2, should I buy 50/3,5? |
|---|---|
| From: | orava@xxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:14:55 +0200 (EET) |
Thank you for encouragement and information. Looks like I have to add this lens to my repertoire. Olli ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: ( OM ) The latest Digest (#68), Winsor Crosby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Sigma -XQ Filtermatic F2.8 16mm Fisheye Lens, iwert |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-system tele zooms?, Jeff Keller |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] FS 50/3.5 was - Having 90/2, should I buy 50/3,5?, Piers Hemy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |