I use my iBook on holiday for dumping images to. I have just bought a
12" G4 1.2GHz (sold a Cont*x lens to finance it and got an educational
discount) and it is plenty fast enough for little digital files :-)
Chris
On 9 Mar 2005, at 09:00, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Apple's justification for being more expensive was that, unlike a PC,
> it already had everything that you need on board. The Pod don't and
> cheaper copies, like the iRiver, seem to do more for less. I guess, for
> me, the music is not enough although I was impressed shooting a wedding
> at the weekend when they used an iPod for all the music - set up files
> for each stage of the day including the ceremony. That was clever.
> The sysops at work use them for reinstalling the system on crashed
> workstations, a disturbingly common occurrence, but I don't know if
> they need a peripheral device for that. I wanted an image tank when I
> first looked - the iPhoto is out now so that seems more sensible
> (anyone using one?) but I still suspect that something so popular among
> my students is unlikely to meet my needs - curmudgeon caution.
> AndrewF
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|