Andrew Gullen wrote:
>On the other hand, I was talking to a pro a few years ago who'd switched out
>of OM to Nikon. He said he wasn't getting reliability. He spent a lot of
>time in light planes and hypothesized it was the vibration that was doing
>them in (though I figure it should have been easy enough to isolate the
>camera from that).
>
Now don't go too far afield. I only claimed that an F(2) would be better
than an OM-1 for Mike's tasks of :
"How about fending off muggers? Pounding in tent >stakes? ;>)"
I made no comments whatsoever about reliability and/or longevity when only
doing what they were designed for! :-)
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|