That lighting situation is well within the exposure capability of an OM-2.
Camera has a defect. The lighting is no different than any other bright
sunny day. If the shutter stayed open to cause overexposure, it would do it
other times too. IF the light were too bright for an OM-2, it would also be
too bright for a 4T.
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
Olympus OM Service since 1977
<:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:>
----- Original Message -----
From: <jking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: OM-1 to OM-4T - worth an upgrade?
>
>>
>> What could you possibly have been shooting in vegas that an OM-2 with any
>> lens couldn't handle? 1/1000 @ f16 and you're overexposed? Using slide
>> film
>> with an asa of 1000?
>
> fuji slide film asa 400
> om2 in auto
> 50mm f1.8 fully shutdown
> hanging (well head shoulders and camera) out of the window of the
> co-pilot's seat of a twin engined aircraft flying through the grand canyon
> in july around mid day (I think it was july)!
>
> James
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|