| Subject: | [OM] Re: OM-1 to OM-4T - worth an upgrade? |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:09:46 -0800 |
Wayne Harridge wrote: >But what about the long term effect on the Hoover Dam ? > No immediate signs of damage. I haven't been back since, but understand it is still standing. >Why would anybody name a dam after a vacuum cleaner anyhow ? > Because of all the money that it sucked up when being built? Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: WTB: flash for E-20, Tim Hughes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Photography with technology from three centuries, NSURIT |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM-1 to OM-4T - worth an upgrade?, Wayne Harridge |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM-1 to OM-4T - worth an upgrade?, Garry Lewis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |