Subject: | [OM] Re: Why do digital cameras have a shutter? |
---|---|
From: | "Simon Worby" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:44:05 -0000 |
Barry B. Bean wrote: > But you are looking at what the sensor sees, and that's what you're > going to end up with. <snip> That argument is OK with camcorders, but when you're taking a snapshot in time, it doesn't hold water. And take flash, for example. No viewfinder gives you the real picture then. Regards, Simon ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] FS: 65-116 Telescopic Auto Tube, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: The first print was [Photo] Can I have your opinon?, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why do digital cameras have a shutter?, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why do digital cameras have a shutter?, Simon Worby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |