Subject: | [OM] Re: Why do digital cameras have a shutter? |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:03:03 -0800 |
Don't think I said they were that good. A wire frame viewfinder was not very good either. I said they had the potential to be good. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Feb 9, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Timpe, Jim wrote: > I disagree Winsor, I don't think they are that good. EVFs, I mean! ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: please help on OM extension tube, AG Schnozz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Why do digital cameras have a shutter?, Barry B. Bean |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why do digital cameras have a shutter?, Timpe, Jim |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why do digital cameras have a shutter?, Steve Schaffner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |