At 08:14 PM 2/3/2005 -0800, you wrote:
>jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >AdobeRGB in addition to sRGB would be good. I'm not sure it
> >really makes any difference, since I just change it in PS,
> >but it's the principle of the thing.
> >
>But it does make a difference. The analogy would be in expanding the
>compress dynamic range of an image. You fill the range, but don't add
>any more data than was there before. Intermediate values may be
>calculated by various algorithms, but they dcan't recreate the
>intermediate tones that would have been there with an exposure/medium
>with less contrast. No matter what the sensor can capture, once it has
>been mapped to sRGB, the inner detail of color variation can't be recreated.
Thanks, makes sense. Do you know how color mapping is done in relation to
RAW capture?
> >I've just purchased another brand's P&S with a 12x zoom.
> >I'm pleased -- I should say astonished -- at the
> >excellent results it returns at the long end
> >
>Now you may see why I'm so crazy for the 10x Tamron 28-300.
>
>Moose
I share your joy. :)
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|