on 1/29/05 9:04 PM, Moose at olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> And all the negs are still
> there! As an example of what a difference that makes, here is a
> comparison of a scan of the faded print in the album and the 6x6 neg
> hiding under it. Both scanned at 2400 dpi setting on a Canon 5000F. You
> can see that whatever 2400 is really, it's enough for this old color neg
> film. It is, of course, a photo of a young Moose
> <http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/Comp02.jpg>.
>
> So thanks for the counsel, but I think I know what I'm about here.
>
> An older Moose
Wow, I didn't know they even had color film back then...!
--
Jim Brokaw
OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
