Subject: | [OM] Re: f-stops (Was: Solstice web-site news) |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:38:50 -0800 |
Walt Wayman wrote: >Chris, > >I believe this fellow's explanation of f-stops, et al., because: >........... >4. He agrees with me, and that alone is reason enough to accept what he says >as being absolutely true and correct. :-) > Good enough for me. Just as long as I don't have to read it all. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 35-105 question, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: f-stops (Was: Solstice web-site news), Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: f-stops (Was: Solstice web-site news), Chris Barker |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: f-stops (Was: Solstice web-site news), Walt Wayman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |