Subject: | [OM] Re: Olympus RAW files? |
---|---|
From: | jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:26:08 -0600 |
Quoting Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > I think > all these > camera software solutions have their problems, as does > Adobe. It is a > trick to work around them. If you can share some tips on things that have helped to work around the oddities, please do! > I have been thinking that archiving the PSD file may be > the way to go > rather than raw. I can't imagine that PSD would ever > become > inaccessible. Anyone have a thought on that? > > > > Winsor Several years ago I began storing all my scans from film as .psd files. I had been storing them as TIFFs but began saving custom channels and layers in some cases which pretty much required staying within the .psd format. Those files load faster in PS too. I don't see that there is anything wrong with the idea. Joel W. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: #024, jowilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [Flash question] What happens if..., James N. McBride |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Olympus RAW files?, Winsor Crosby |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Olympus RAW files?, Mark Dapoz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |