Subject: | [OM] Re: questions. |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:04:00 +0800 |
And the 200/5 is very dark, more like a F5.6. C.H.Ling ----- Original Message ----- From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > The two Zuiko 200mm lenses are very different beasts. The photo here > doesn't do justice to the look and feel difference > <http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/olympusom1n2/shared/zuiko/htmls/200mm1.htm>. > The f5 is amazingly small and light. I've assumed the extra element in > the f5 is to get the length down. Both are excellent lenses in > performance if proper vibration control is used. > Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] E*son 2200, DICK LAGUE |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] E*son 2200, C.H.Ling |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: questions., Moose |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: questions., Skip Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |