IMHO the Nikon scanners are the top of the heap right now. The 5000 and
5 I mean. I have messed with Minolta and Cannon. The Nikon is where I
would spend my money. Especially if you have an Epson 2200 to work
with.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Richard Lovison
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 5:28 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] [OT] E*son 2200
I own an E*son 3170 flatbed scanner and I was wondering if anyone had
made prints on an E*son 2200 using neg scans (Fuji NPS) from this
scanner or the 3280? If so, do you feel a decent print can be made up
to 8x12, something comparable to a good photographic print? I would
initially use the 2200 to make 4x6's for greeting cards and possibly
8x12's to be sold. I would then consider purchasing an E*son 5400
scanner or something comparable at a later date. Any advice would be
appreciated.
Richard
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|