For some reason, Chuck, your post made me laugh! ;-)
I think that they both meant that there is no immediate display of
histogram; that you have to reply the image to see the histogram. As
you write: why are these histograms not histograms? How not indeed?
Chris
On 4 Jan 2005, at 12:45, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Siddiq, presumably referring to the E1 and 300, said:
> Neither Oly has histogram display, rather critical given the 5ish stop
> range it can capture at best wonder if a firmware update will fix it in
> the E1/300.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Eh? Then what are the histograms shown on these pages?
> <http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse1/page8.asp>
> <http://www.dpreview.com/articles/olympuse300/page7.asp>
>
> To further confuse me, CH, who owns an E-1, did not object to this
> statement and, instead, replied: "Once you have used RAW you will never
> miss the histogram..."
>
> I am confused. What don't I understand about this exchange? Why are
> these histograms not histograms?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|