Donald:
That's interesting. Your b300 is a 1.7x converter. What sort of f-stop
loss do you see (less than 1, 1, more than 1)? Also how does the
picture quality compare with a conventional converter?
Donald MacDonald wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:51:16 -0500, Martin Walters <mwalters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>>Anyone have any comments or experience?
>>
>>Martin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Martin,
>
> I've used my B300 on the 135/2.8 and the 200/4 with some success, as
> well
>as on my IS3000. In common with general experience, the 200 seems a little
>tricky with any extension, but it works. The 135 with the B300 is very
>handy, if you don't want to carry additional lenses.
>
>I'm usually doing this handheld, because the circumstances I'm using the
>combo in are precisely the ones where I'm not carrying a 'pod.
>
>Quality is VG, IME.
>
>D.
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|