ML Archiv: [OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble

Subject:	[OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble
From:	Siddiq <iddibhai@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:08:16 -0800

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 06:22:51 +0000, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
wrote:


> The older S-Class cars have long been a good buy over here, but their
> fuel consumption is of course way out of line.

S320 CDI?

-- 
/S
aim:iddibhai
icq:104079359
email/msn:msidd004atstudentdotucrdotedu


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, (continued) [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, Timpe, Jim [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, Simon Worby [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, IanG [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, Wayne Harridge [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, Timpe, Jim [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, Larry [OM] OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Chris Barker [OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Jamie Costello [OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Chris Barker [OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Siddiq <= [OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Siddiq [OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Chris Barker [OM] Re: OT MX5 quality, was Olympus Trouble, JOHN DUGGAN [OM] Re: OT MX5 quality, was Olympus Trouble, Chris Barker [OM] Re: OT MX5 quality, was Olympus Trouble, Wayne Harridge [OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Chris Barker [OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, John Hudson [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble, Mike

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Film recommendation, John A. Lind
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Film recommendation, Siddiq
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Chris Barker
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: OT Merc quality, was Olympus Trouble, Siddiq
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]