You have a dead short in your camera. Be careful of swollen batteries.
They can explode (and have a few times when the only thing stopping them was
the pressure of the battery cap.
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane,
Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
_________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio D Vargas" <Antonio.Vargas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 8:49 PM
Subject: [OM] OM-10 drains batteries fast
> Hi OM-10 owners,
>
> My OM-10 seems to be draining batteries really fast. After a few clicks
> on my
> cam, I checked the batteries and they were quite hot. Later I left the
> batteries inside but turned of the cam and when I tried the camera after a
> while, the batteries seem to be dead. Looking at the batteries, they all
> seem
> to have swollen a bit. Is this a common problem for OM-10s? Any
> recommendation
> on how to fix this, or are there any info sources you can point me to?
>
> thanks,
> -anton
>
> Richard Lovison wrote:
>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> Hmmm, if I understand the addition and subtraction of positive and
>> negative numbers correctly, the formula should be:
>>
>> nominal value = (actual power) + (-0.7 diopter)
>>
>> My diopter is -1.25 and according to the above formula my OM correction
>> lens should be a -1.95 or -2. In truth, a -3 type 1 works for me on my
>> OM-1.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Richard
>>
>> --- Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm here to report that I have just finished checking out two Type 1
>> > dioptric correction lenses and have experienced the same thing that
>> > David did with the Type 2's. My distance prescription is
>> > approximately
>> > +1 diopter and, according to the both of the eSIF's Type 1 or Type 2
>> > tables, I should require a -1 correction lens. I was already aware
>> > of
>> > David's comment regarding the Type 2 correction lenses. When I
>> > spotted
>> > some Type 1 correction lenses at KEH recently I was primed for a
>> > problem
>> > and so I ordered both a 0 and a -1. Today I received them and can
>> > report that the best fit for me is the 0. This exactly fits David's
>> > final recommendation for Type 2's. You should subtract 0.7 diopter
>> > from
>> > your prescription value and order the nearest available correction
>> > lens
>> > to that result.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
>> http://vote.yahoo.com
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>
>
> -- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
> -- Type: text/x-vcard
> -- File: Antonio.Vargas.vcf
> -- Desc: Card for Antonio D Vargas
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|