Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: BW Paper revisited part II

Subject: [OM] Re: BW Paper revisited part II
From: AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 20:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
> I used to use Panatomic X then it was 
> dropped.  Then I went to using Agfa 25.  Then it was Pan F.  I
> also used 
> Tech Pan for a while.  All now gone...  So it looks like I'll
> be settling on Tmax100 and Tri-X.

Yikes!  I'm going to suggest that you convert to Kodak BW 400. 
I'd hate for your "black cloud" nature cause the discontinuance
of Tmax100 or Tri-X.  <smile>

> I can forsee the day in 
> the future when making a silver print will be considered an
> 'alternative' process.

I hate to say it, but it's already there.  I challenge you to
find any commercial lab offering silver-gelatin prints.  I may
be one of only a handful in the entire state and the only one
offering fiber prints. One of those labs is planning to
completely shutdown all B&W processing at the end of this year.

AG


        
                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz