Skip Williams wrote:
>Wow, I'm very surprised at the E300's small size. That isn't apparant from
>the marketing pictures.
>
That's what I was trying to convey with the cubic volume figures I
posted. It looks like it may really be different in an important way.
Skip Williams wrote:
>On dpreview, I've heard $1k WITHOUT the lens, which could be a deal killer!
>It needs to be street-priced at $900-$1000 WITH a kit lens to take significant
>market share quickly.
>
Yup, 1 strike. Or was it a tip? The other under $1,000 kits are 6mp and
the new 20D is 8. Actual photographic meaning aside, mps still seem to
be a strong marketing force.
>I also saw a release date after January, which will also kill all the holiday
>sales.
>
Yup, strike 2.
I hope it's still 3 strikes before you are out. Here comes the next
pitch. And........... it's a noise ball! Will Oly be able to hit it?
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|