Subject: | [OM] Re: Scanner or copy using digital body |
---|---|
From: | "Jeff Keller" <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:46:35 -0700 |
No direct experience ... a former list member tried to get digital copies of slides using a digital camera and slide copier. Dust is still a major issue. The relatively low res copies I saw over the internet weren't as good as the pictures he took of real scenes using the same digital camera. He was wanting to get a film scanner but I don't know if he did. You won't save any time with post processing vs. a film scanner. -jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "swisspace" <swisspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [OM] Scanner or copy using digital body > My current line of thought is having just bought a bellows and slide > copier from that auction place is to not buy a scanner but spend a > little extra on a digital body and adapter and copy the slides that way. > > I think this may be much faster as it will require less post processing, > once you have the camera set up correctly. I then also have a digital > body to use. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Question about OM-4 spot meter, Jez Cunningham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: The monitor debate: LCD vs CRT, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Scanner or copy using digital body, swisspace |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Scanner or copy using digital body, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |