HK, you do not think that a consumer level wide angle zoom as opposed
to the Oly 21/2 high end prime that wowed everyone for its quality when
it was issued has anything to do with recording less fine detail in the
digital image? It is interesting too that the scanned film seems to
have less dynamic range with more over exposed highlights and darker
shadows with less detail than the digital image. The extra contrast can
make it look like there is more detail. I don't really think the
argument is made and if a careful test would be done and a difference
found, it would be so small as to be insignificant.
Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Sep 10, 2004, at 8:44 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> Talking about resolution I have to step in again, it is never possible
> that
> a 5MP E-1 or 6MP 10D is better than ISO100 slides. During my Europe
> trip I
> have a few slides that are taken with the Zuiko 21/2 and E-1 with
> 11-22 (at
> 11mm). There is one example, don't complaint about the slightly
> different in
> object size, the resolution different between the two is very obviouse.
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/P8193517.jpg (1.1MB, 11mm at F4, 1/800s)
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/P_06.jpg (3.2MB, 21/2 at F5.6, OM4 auto)
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
