As are the bright blue power lines.
Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Sep 10, 2004, at 8:44 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> Talking about resolution I have to step in again, it is never possible
> that
> a 5MP E-1 or 6MP 10D is better than ISO100 slides. During my Europe
> trip I
> have a few slides that are taken with the Zuiko 21/2 and E-1 with
> 11-22 (at
> 11mm). There is one example, don't complaint about the slightly
> different in
> object size, the resolution different between the two is very obviouse.
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/P8193517.jpg (1.1MB, 11mm at F4, 1/800s)
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/P_06.jpg (3.2MB, 21/2 at F5.6, OM4 auto)
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wayne S" <om4t@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The other thing I have been noticing is the result of scans versus the
> E-1.
>> I use the LS-4000 scanner and am wondering if I am able to get all the
>> resolution out of the slide film. The E-1 shots equal or better the OM
>> shots much of the time. Maybe it is the lower vibration, maybe it is
>> the
>> lenses, or maybe it is the scanner? I'm still trying to sort it all
>> out.
>> I don't have a high powered loupe.
>>
>> Wayne
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
