Subject: | [OM] Re: Lily Pads photo |
---|---|
From: | Richard Lovison <sylv4700@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 6 Sep 2004 05:12:09 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks Chris. The blurred leaves (reflection) has more to do with depth of field than disturbed water even though the water was more disturbed behind the tree stump. The tree stump was about 20 feet off shore from where I was standing and the shoreline behind the stump was about a couple hundred feet from me. Richard --- Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That's a lovely photo Richard. > > I found it confusing at first as the leaves are blurred towards the > top > and I thought that you might have inverted the image. I realise now > > that the water must have been disturbed in the top third of the > picture, thus blurring the reflection of the leaves. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: A day without digital, ClassicVW |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Lily Pads photo, Earl Dunbar |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Lily Pads photo, Siddiq |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Lily Pads photo, Piers Hemy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |