Incredible imprecision you inimitable imbecile.
Don't doubt that desperate double digit dabbling deviants devise
dubious diversions
BUT, meanwhile, where the 707 is not necessarily a Boeing -
Terrifying trans-Pacific termagants twitter tartly to triple-digit
trainspotters who take time taking terse and tittilating
transmogrifications.
Call yourself collectors?! You've got singles and doubles - how can
your collection survive without a triple? Nice 707 in front of me now
(with flash grip and 50mm) - how else could you possible use a Zuiko on
a body with a built-in flash, built-in winder? And the battery cover is
just fine thanks. Make an offer if you like.
I quite like them, image quality is good enough, lenses soooo cheap,
the 50 macro is rather good, etc...
And they feel more robust than the doubles too. ('Feel' - I said!)
AndrewF
On 04/09/2004, at 4:40 AM, Walt Wayman wrote:
> Please forgive my imprecise vocabulation! I referred strictly, only,
> and exclusively to the OM mentioned in the Re: line, the OM77AF, and
> no others. I meant no slander, or hint thereof, relative to any other
> double-digit darling or darlings diverse daring dabblers dare diddle
> with.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|