Moose, thanks for the comments. To me, they are normal for a super wide
(they were taken at 11mm). Besides X-Y distortion, there is also distortion
at the Z-axis. The lower you put the horizontal line the more distort the
look. When the horizontal line is at the center than you get a totally
corrected veiw.
Optially the 11-22 is quite good, here is a sample at 17mm F5.6 setting:
http://www.accura.com.hk/P3332.jpg (1.3MB)
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Quite a wonderful set of shots, CH.
>
> My favorites are 3029 and Giulietta.
>
> Overall good lens performance as far as one can tell from these small
> images. Some pretty obvious flare in 2045.
>
> Some really interesting things going on in 3259 and 60. 259 is
> dizzymaking, with the church falling/collapsing away from the camera
> next to the Tower, which is leaning to the left, but also falling away.
> 260 is also interesting, with the center of the church looking fine, but
> its left side leaning in and the building to the left leaning toward it.
> Most of the rest of the perspectives work for me.
>
> Thanks for the look,
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
