yeah, but you know it just aint gonna happen. There is no point.
Shoot some film, develop in the darkroom, or scan. Mean while I
just don't need to hang onto so much OM stuff anymore. I did
convince myself to hang onto an OM-3t for those really cold
winter moments. The OM-1 has no diopter adjustment, I need that.
Don't you know the diaphragm mechanism on the OM's is a
major source of vibration. New camrah much better. And you
can stop it down with your little finger. very nice. smooth.
What, are we becoming a bunch of old farts with too much
time on our hands? snap out of it everyone. Let's see some
more pictures, I don't care if you used a C*non either. or what
dpi it is. Cameras are not much good if we don't use them.
Those Tope's are looking really nice.
\A/yne
At 04:56 PM 8/15/2004, you wrote:
>>I would not want a digital body for the OM system. The E-1 with adapter
>>is close enough if you really want to use the OM glass.
>>
>Not really. An OM digital would have auto diaphram with OM lenses, bring
>functionality right up to existing OMs, but with digital output. I'm not
>saying there ever will be such a critter, only that it would be
>functionally much more complete than using the lenses in stop-down mode.
>
>Now here's a project for somebody, an OM to 4/3 adapter with stop down
>mechanism built in. Extra points for tapping into the camera battery for
>power, after all there is power going to the electronic lenses. Then
>you need to time stop down from the stop down signal sent to digital
>lenses. Maybe its all the same connection, power applied when stop down
>needed? Doesn't that make it a sort of OM-5?
>
>Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|