| Subject: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged |
|---|---|
| From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:58:00 +1000 |
> Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Well put. And if sex was more efficient via computer, would you switch? > :-) > I thought most people had already ? ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Any comments on E-1 and microdrives?, C.H.Ling |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Test-scan, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Workshop, was: Custom Camera, NSURIT |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged, John Hudson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |