I have looked at this when you posted it before, but it is hard for me
to reach any conclusion either way when the scale of the photos are so
different. The detail in the 10D example is a fraction of the size of
the detail in the scan. How can you tell. Ironically the contrast and
color is so diminished in the scan that in many areas detail is no
better and sometimes worse than the same areas in the much smaller 10D
image.
Winsor
Long Beach, CA
USA
On Aug 14, 2004, at 7:38 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> I have done lots of comparison, if just talking about resolution, film
> is
> still clearly better. But for "noise" and "color", digital is a winner.
> Below is a resolution test I have posted before:
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/Film-10D.htm
>
> C.H.Ling
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|