I am not sure why people keep arguing about this. Digital "looks" better,
even at 3-4MP. The lack of grains make it look sharper. So keep saying the
DSLR enlargement looks better or looks sharper is missing the point.
At 06:22 PM 8/14/2004, Tom Scales wrote:
>...Seems like a reasonable comparison. The Zuiko is a better lens (smoother),
>so film gets that advantage.
>
>The results?
>
>The D100 image, printed this size, is clearly superior. Not a little bit. A
>LOT better. Grainless. Perfect. Sharp. Stunning. The OM image is good.
> >From the right viewing distance outstanding. Up close, though, the grain is
>very clearly visible. The scan also required considerably more effort to
>'spot' for the inevitable dust spots.
>...
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
use richard at imagecraft.com)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|